Текущая ставка€105
ниже 3 из 3 ориентиров
Недавние продажи (12 мес)
€150
+30%
мин €135 · 4 прод. · в сегодняшних €
Мин. розница (WB)€169
+38%
Рейтинг WB87.4
225 оценок
Справедливая цена за рейтинг
€134
типичная выше на -12%
кривая рынка
Медиана оценок
87.0
разброс ±2.0 · 85–92 · 10 оценок
Отзывы (по убыванию авторитета автора)
Суммаризация отзывов
Хересный купаж старых и молодых бочек с ровным балансом и умеренным, не доминирующим хересом; опытные ценят гармонию и глубину, но многие находят напиток средним без ярких акцентов, отсюда разброс оценок.
развернуть подробно
В аромате переплетаются свежие молодые ноты спелых фруктов, орехов с мёдом, цитрусов, цветочной пыльцы и сухофруктов с джемом со сдержанным старым хересом и старым дубом; профиль раскрывается слоями и требует времени и большого шарообразного бокала. Во вкусе — сладкий солодовый старт, затем хересная фруктовость и пряно-горьковатая дубовая подложка (мёд с имбирём, грейпфрут, кислые яблоки, тёмный шоколад с орехами и эспрессо); послевкусие среднедлинное, вяжущее, с лёгкой шоколадно-ореховой горчинкой, у некоторых короткое и просто сладко-пряное. Хвалят за безупречный баланс, многослойность и удачный брак старых и молодых спиртов при выразительных 43%.
Главное расхождение методологическое: опытные и владельцы бутылок оценивают напиток заметно выше (до 92–93), настаивая, что он раскрывается лишь при больших порциях и долгом дыхании, тогда как дегустировавшие маленькие образцы вслепую находят его крепким, но средним, «добротным без изюминки». Критика сводится к отсутствию яркого характерного акцента и к некоторым слишком свежим нотам в послевкусии, которые нравятся не всем. Оценки колеблются в диапазоне 85–92 при общей согласованности вокруг 87, и разброс объясняется скорее форматом дегустации и терпением автора, чем реальными изъянами.
A gorgeous, delicious, beautiful whisky to drink! 22 22 21 22 87
Blind tasting of a sample.
нос 88 · вкус 87 · финиш 85
[October 2020] I started to drink single malt whisky in the early nineties and since then I experienced basically three different kinds of interesting drams (leaving all the forgot-about-it-on-next-morning stuff aside): First there are the truly exceptional malts which I recognise immediately upon the first sniff and sip and no matter when or where I have another dram - I will enjoy it greatly. The second group are malts which offer an interesting nose and taste upon the first encounter but the more I drink the less I enjoy these drams (which I call "hit-and-run" stuff) - unfortunately many modern whiskies fall into this category. But there is the exact opposite to this group as well: Whiskies which appear rather average and uninteresting on the first dram, but they grow boldly on every additional sip, I call these "shy champions"... ...and this old anniversary edition of Glenfarclas is one of the best examples for this third category. The first measure provides the impressions of an average faultless sherried dram without highlights, not more and not less. But every additional dram digs me deeper into a world of complex and perfectly balanced aromas and flavours which were not there during the first sips. Maybe my taste buds were not capable to detect all these interwoven impressions right on and had to adapt to such a profile first. Maybe it is all different? Finally, I do not care, I simply enjoy it. I experience such profiles quite often with drams which are rated average by many members (who had just a sample at their hands) but exceptional by a few (who own one or more bottles). The great thing about the "shy champions" is you can buy such bottles at competitive prices, still (e.g., at whisky auctions). But be cautions: Not every malt with a chequered rating is a "shy champion", it could well be a faulty dram too which flaws some people tolerate (or even enjoy) and others not... [July 2015] I emptied another bottle that I bought for 98 Euro in December 2014. This special anniversary bottling was vatted from 16 casks from all of the last decades until 2000 including the oldest cask no. 1711 in the warehouse which was distilled in 1952. ...not to be tasted when in a rush! And small samples do not work either. [December 2014] Together with friends I emptied a bottle that I bought for 98 Euro in September 2014. In my old rating system (ten scales that translate into WB points: 50 - 66 - 75 - 80 - 82,5 - 85 - 87,5 - 90 - 92,5 - 95) I scored it 90. [November 2022] I re-tasted this dram after an exceptionally good 37-years old Glenmorangie (WB213714) which I scored 93 points and guess what? I still score this Glenfarclas on par with that old Glenmorangie on 93 points too. But I can fully comprehend if others find this dram rather average only because it does not offer any signature "spike" flavours or "I-kick-your-taste-buds" impressions. Instead, it is just an extraordinary harmonious mix of delicious flavours with both fresh young and complex old characteristics in a (sorry folks, I have to repeat this) sexy combo. Forget about any small measures tasting, this will just lead to nowhere as my taste buds demand at least 5cl before they accept to acknowledge the high quality of this dram. This was and still stays my benchmark dram when it comes down to calibrate scores above 92 points - the only problematic thing is that it is very hard to stop yourself serving the next dram once you had two drams already. But there are many more worse things in life than that...
| Нос |
93 |
The colour is auburn, and the nose offers a perfect mixture of fresh younger and complex older aromas without any off-note or imbalance. All three the malt, sherry and wooden impressions are bold but leave enough space for each other to contribute to an impressive team effort. This nose proves there is a lot of very old stuff added to this batch. It requires some breathing time to fully enfold (which is quite common for complex drams) so do not fool yourself with the NAS (No Age Statement) and the fresh impressions of the first sniff - this nose has a lot to offer but it demands some time and patience to reveal all of its secrets. By the way, a big spherical blender's glass is recommended to enhance the nosing enjoyment (I score the nose out of a standard Glencairn glass 90 points only and the final score of 93 points after about 30 minutes of breathing in the blender's glass). |
| Вкус |
92 |
The taste is multi-multi layered because of the different age maturations included in this batch and extremely joyful to explore. It starts with rather sweeter impressions by the malt, followed by sherry-induced fruity flavours before the wood adds some bitter-spicy notes to balance out the profile. I guess trained taste buds can identify more than 30 different flavours in this dram which march across my taste buds as if they celebrate a victory parade. These are very sensual impressions, almost a little sexy (if a whisky can be sexy than this dram is). But again, it takes some time before your taste buds may adapt to this complexity and are able to manage this onrush of flavours so take your time and ... forget about any small sample tasting. This dram requires larger measures to unlock all of its secrets (I score the first sip 88 points only, the second 90 and from the third on the full score of 92). |
| Финиш |
93 |
The dram arrives very charming on my taste buds with a warming feeling and a creamy texture that instantly coats all of my mouth without distracting moments. The finish is long and turns even more dark chocolatey with appropriate support of different spices to keep the balance. No distracting bitter or astringent moments until the very end so all casks were carefully selected for this anniversary bottling. It is a lot of fun to chew this dram even after it went down the throat completely because even then some new impressions seem to pop up. To be honest, this dram is somewhat "erotic" to me (sorry folks, I am a nasty old guy when it comes down to old-school whisky). Water is not needed. |
Excellent marriage of old and young maturation. The sherry not dominate. 43% ABV is expressive.
| Нос |
86 |
Sweet, peppery, citrus, honey and a little elderberry. |
| Вкус |
84 |
Sweet and some dishes that speak. |
| Финиш |
85 |
Short, sweet, spiciness |
This is a good whisky, by every means, but it did not become a sherry monster.
Blender's Glass (recommended!). Aroma 23. Subtle notes of old sherry and old oak are intertwined with younger fresh aromas of ripe fruit, nuts with honey, flower and grass pollen, citrus and dried fruit with jam. It does take time - it unfolds layer by layer, gradually. Taste 22.5 Spicy, tart - like eating honey with ginger, grapefruit, sour apples in hay, dark chocolate with nuts and espresso foam with a wooden spoon. The aftertaste is 22 medium-long, astringent with a slight bitterness of chocolate and nuts. Balance 22.5
нос 91 · вкус 90 · финиш 89
нос 89 · вкус 88 · финиш 87
Tried at a regulars' table, therefore shorter notes. Nice assemblage of various vintages from GF, the old ones really add depth, with very fresh notes coming through in the finish that I don't 100% like. Still a great, round and complex piece.