Отзывы (по убыванию авторитета автора)
Суммаризация отзывов
Экспериментальный Ardbeg 2018 в хорошо обожжённых бочках из-под красного вина: ароматный нос с изюмом, кофе и дымом, но тонкое, суховатое тело. Опытные ставят выше среднего, признавая находкой, тогда как многие считают базовую «десятку» выгоднее и цельнее.
развернуть подробно
В аромате отмечают сладкое винное начало — красный виноград, изюм в роме, кровяные апельсины, лимон, к которым добавляются кожа, свежемолотый кофе, копчёный окорок, мебельная полировка и холодный пепельный дым; торф присутствует, но привычная морская, солёная островная нота Ardbeg отходит на второй план, а у части дегустаторов вино прямо конфликтует с торфом. Во вкусе многие фиксируют разочарование после обещающего носа: тело тонкое, почти водянистое при 46%, маслянистая атака быстро сменяется сажей, солью, пеплом, лимонной цедрой и пряностями (паприка, чёрный перец, барбекю), сладкие и цитрусовые ноты то спорят с дистиллятным характером, то побеждают. Послевкусие короткое-среднее, суховатое, с горчинкой, кофе-эспрессо, перцем и обильной копотью; несколько человек списывают меловую минеральность и танинную вязкость на девственный дуб, а не на винные бочки.
Опытные ревьюеры в целом благосклоннее (в основном 84–87), называя это удачным поворотом для Ardbeg и раскрывающимся при спокойной неспешной дегустации, хотя и они признают тонкое тело и невыдающийся результат. Менее авторитетные оценки заметно разбросаны (от 80–83 у скептиков до 88–89 у энтузиастов): критики видят «дизайнерский» виски с навязчивой сладостью, дисгармонией и завышенной коллекционной ценой, настойчиво предпочитая базовую «десятку» по соотношению цена/качество, тогда как поклонники хвалят необычное сочетание фруктов, дыма и мясных, угольных нот как яркий, игровой эксперимент. Согласованность средняя: профиль все описывают схоже, но вердикт «находка или переоценённый курьёз» раскалывает аудиторию.
dram-drinker
83
23 aug 2018 10:16 pm
Interesting that I didn't look up what I rated for the committee release a while ago but it turns out to be exactly the same - still unimpressive
| Нос |
83 |
Reluctant peat and smoke, some citrusy notes, somehow also some wineish notes - pretty okayish but not yet convincing |
| Вкус |
84 |
Much more peat and smoke than on the nose, just little swetness, rather dry, a dry bonfire, hints of vanilla, still just little fruitiness like citrus fruits, some herbs, thyme, sage, black tea |
| Финиш |
82 |
Medium long, warm, smoky, a tad bitter |
Hvdree
84
24 jun 2018 1:08 pm
нос 84 · вкус 85 · финиш 84
Dris
87
19 oct 2018 1:05 am
Finally a twist on Ardbeg, lovely apple-pecan-pie on the nose. A bit too thin on the palate though.
нос 89 · вкус 86 · финиш 87
peatbogger
80
30 sep 2018 9:24 pm
Just a small sample at a fair. Did not convince me to buy a full bottle. A good old TEN is far better value.
| Нос |
85 |
The nose was promissing. Definitely Ardbeg, peaty, dry smoke, ash, cured meat, slightly medicinal. Some underlying sweeter and fruityer notes. |
| Вкус |
80 |
Total let down from the nose. Thin mouthfeel, almost watery compaired to what was expected. The peat is faint, so is almost everything else. The sweet and fruity notes do not suit the basic Ardbeg profile, something is clashing. |
| Финиш |
75 |
Hardly medium lenght. Bittersweet and dry. |
alex..w..fan
85
13 aug 2020 7:42 pm
21 22 21 21 85
Archer
87
22 jun 2018 11:19 pm
So in the garden on the grill or just in between times (eg on a fair ;-)), he can not necessarily score big. But tasted with peace, he already shows his qualities. Whether he is priced or just in the frame, ultimately everyone must decide for themselves and their wallet.
| Нос |
88 |
There is something sweet, unspecified, which starts at the first moment ... the wine barrel? Possibly. Anyway, it sets itself above the distillery character, at least at the beginning of Verriechens. Red grapes, a little lemon, cold smoke. Then also old, cracked leather, the grapes become raisins in rum. Smoked ham, some furniture polish. Coffee beans, freshly ground. Always the raisins as a sweet companion. |
| Вкус |
87 |
Very oily onset, on the tongue like the bite in a floury apple - without the apple flavor, because the raisins are also found on the tongue. Cold and ashy smoke, lemon peels. Yeah, the lanky Ardbegaschenbecher, also in this groovy thing here. |
| Финиш |
86 |
Not too long, not too dry, with raisins, dates, cocoa, espresso beans, wood and fine-seasoned spices. |
Dre73
87
28 may 2018 8:05 am
нос 86 · вкус 87 · финиш 88
hs305
84
17 jun 2018 10:40 pm
[June, 2018] I had this dram during this year's "Feis Ile" tasting session. For about five years in a row I found every new Feis Ile Ardbeg edition weaker than the one before so I am curious if the Grooves can change this unfortunate legacy… The first impression on the nose is very Kelpie-ish with lots of peaty, herbal and eucalyptus notes (I do not like these because they remind me of bitter cough medicine when I was young). The initial mouthfeel is warming but without any coating effect and a minor astringent feeling (heavy tannins from virgin oak). Most probably the distillery owns a lot of virgin Caucasian oak casks that provide the eucalyptus notes and heavy tannins (you know, the owners of Ardbeg do not have a bourbon distillery in their portfolio so they have difficulties to source enough bourbon casks for the ever increasing production due to the ongoing whisky boom. Consequently, they have to use virgin oak casks instead and they sourced some wood from Caucasia what is cheaper but it adds different flavours to the whisky than American or European oak. Nobody tried this before so this flavour profile was unknown so far - but what can you do else if you run short of high quality oak supply from the traditional sources?). The taste is very sweet with flavours of red fruits and dry peat. Better than the nose, for sure. The finish is of medium length and very chalky and mineral with a drying end (papers). With water the dram gets less sweet and more peaty but the chalky and mineral notes increase too, what I do not like. By the way, there is not much wine influence to detect at all neither in the nose nor the taste or finish. Okay, this one is better than the Kelpie but still I do not really like it (I find the standard 10-years old much better, without doubts). My best guess is that Ardbeg desperately looks out for ways to get rid of the virgin Caucasian oak casks that do not fit into their standard editions like the 10-years old or the Corryvreckan because of the strong unusual flavours they impose. But the good news is, the second fill of the Caucasian casks will be much better and less aggressive, for sure...
нос 83 · вкус 85 · финиш 84
ctu
86
11 sep 2018 8:06 am
For me it's rather virgin oak than ex-wine casks. Slightly thin at 46%. But not bad.
KonstUA
86
09 jun 2020 8:49 pm
Nose 22, taste 22, finish 21, balance 21
WhiskyLovingPianist
83
16 sep 2024 4:37 pm
https://whiskylovingpianist.wordpress.com/2024/09/16/plastic-oh-no-band-battle-of-the-beg/ This didn’t go down so well for me on the [Ardbeg] Day in 2018, but then look at what it was put up against [WLP83]. Let’s try it in today’s context. N: Gosh, this is quite a shock after those two excellent ‘Ten’s’ despite their plastic corruption. There’s a distinct wine-like pong to this one. Ah, yes – ex-wine casks! Rather confectionary towards boiled sweets, lollies, and salmon[!]. Ardbeg’s saltiness is present, but the mix of peat, iodine, ash, and wine – what wine[?], sweet wine[?] – sauternes[?] – is a clash. T: My instincts were right the first time around. There’s plenty to talk about but this is truly a struggle once again. It reminds me of some of Wolfburn’s ‘experiments’, followed by Starward and their ‘Unexpected’ [WLP]. F: Menthol over aniseed, something of the jam of a Bakewell Tart, a bite of a Strawberry Split, then the confusing clash of the additional savoury peat, ash, bitter grilled lemon with a wine-y barley sugar conclusion. C: There are dozens and dozens of bottles still for sale from €150 on WBMarketplace and yet [still] going for under €100 at auction. Why anyone would want this over any of the standard expressions is puzzling. 83 [again]
Quak
86
02 may 2026 6:17 pm
нос 86 · вкус 87 · финиш 85
Kantenmechaniker
88
19 jan 2021 12:29 am
Great nose, nice in the mouth, nothing to complain about, Ardbeg can release more of this variety
markjedi1
84
13 jul 2019 7:29 am
Eclatant This Ardbeg was the limited release for Ardbeg Day 2018. I have to admit that I was a bit Ardbeg-tired as I felt the special releases did not live up to the standard range. So my expectations for this Grooves were not that high. By the way: Grooves refers to the… err… grooves that appear when charring the red wine casks that were used for this release. The nose starts sweet and citrusy, with blood oranges, leather, rum raisins and freshly ground coffee beans. A bitter note from black grapes, furniture polish and tannins. Then some sweet pastry, rhubarb and paprika, followed by smoked ham and woodsmoke. The peat is present, surly – you notice this is an Ileach from the first moment – but the typical maritime character of Ardbeg is not immediately recognizable. Having said that, this one smells rather interesting. It starts sooty and salt on the palate, the smoke develops immediately and the sweet notes – that are present and actually increase – are no match for the distillery character now. But wait! While salt and sweet go to battle, it is citrus fruit that cries victory in the end. This makes for a playful malt that searches the extremes a bit and is quite surprising. Very spicy, by the way. Paprika, black pepper and barbecue sauce. Eclatant! The finish is somewhat short, mildly drying on espresso, pepper and smoke. Soot and more soot at the death. If there was something like caramelized charcoal, this is it! Congratulations, Ardbeg! What a fun expression. A conversation piece malt. Pleasant surprise.
dRambo
85
21 jun 2018 12:35 pm
нос 89 · вкус 85 · финиш 85
zzqfyl
85
08 apr 2022 6:46 pm
нос 86 · вкус 85 · финиш 85
thijs100
87
25 may 2018 1:57 pm
Good, well-engineerd whisky from Ardbeg, that offers an interesting drinking experience. However, as with almost all the Ardbeg Day releases, their core range offer much more value for money.
Ficelli
87
11 mar 2021 5:13 pm
нос 87 · вкус 85 · финиш 88
Cast Olila
85
03 jun 2018 9:46 pm
нос 85 · вкус 83 · финиш 85
dapoinbua
88
20 apr 2023 9:26 pm
нос 89 · вкус 88 · финиш 88
Tom na Gruagaich
80
12 dec 2018 10:57 pm
An example of designer whisky. The nose is so strong, sweet and straight that there is no room for subtle notes. In the mouth then somehow too bitter and yet not completely harmonious, but also somehow unaware of extreme, so that does not quite fit for me. Still good whisky.
ARDBERG
85
28 jun 2018 5:43 am
нос 86 · вкус 84 · финиш 87
mema82
84
27 nov 2018 1:31 am
нос 85 · вкус 84 · финиш 83
FernetBranco
85
05 oct 2020 5:50 pm
нос 85 · вкус 86 · финиш 85
wisekyofcourse
85
23 jun 2018 7:38 pm
the almost caramelized toast side, the almost sweet peat, the more prominent fruit than usual in Ardbeg and the meaty meat side, then the sensation of cold grilled meat and cold ashes next to it make a singular spectacle!
нос 85 · вкус 85 · финиш 84
Georges
89
27 dec 2019 11:10 pm
Ardbeg Grooves was released in celebration of Ardbeg Day 2018. Part of the whisky that makes up Grooves was matured in red wine casks that were very well-charred, resulting in heavy grooves in the surface of the wood.
AH Whiskyvitrine
82
03 jul 2018 11:13 pm
нос 83 · вкус 83 · финиш 83
dramspotter
81
03 jul 2018 3:35 am
quite different that nose and I guess commendable; a bottle would be worth having if the price was less: otherwise not value-for-money
P.A.O.K.you_are
87
22 feb 2020 9:40 pm
Malthead19
87
09 mar 2023 9:16 am
COLOUR: light amber (without dye) - super special bottling from Ardbeg - a top Ardbeg-Day bottling => worth it - definitely a different direction than the classic Ardbeg style - very tasty combo between fruit and smoke - at the issue price at that time fully OK - current prices are rather collector's prices, nevertheless worthwhile this bottling is definitely worth drinking
schengel10
87
19 mar 2019 7:30 am
The special bottling 2018 - again an interesting and very good Malt! [Color] amber;